10/28/2024 / By News Editors
President Donald J. Trump is floating the elimination of the federal income tax, with the revenue from it being replaced by income from import and export tariffs. The tax policy change, first floated by Trump during a recent campaign stop at a Bronx, New York barbershop, has caught fire on social media—even receiving the enthusiastic backing of former Congressman and libertarian firebrand Ron Paul (R-TX).
(Article by William Upton republished from TheNationalPulse.com)
While the concept might sound farfetched on the modern political stage, it was not that long ago that the U.S. federal government was entirely—or almost entirely—funded through tariff revenue. Trump emphasized this fact during his Bronx stop. “It had all tariffs—it didn’t have an income tax,” Trump remarked at the Knockout Barbershop. He expressed concern about the financial burden income taxes impose on citizens, stating, “They’re paying tax, and they don’t have the money to pay the tax.”
On the campaign trail, Trump has strongly pushed for a more aggressive U.S. tariff policy. The 2024 Republican presidential nominee has proposed introducing a broad tariff regime on foreign imports ranging from 10 to 20 percent, with a significant 60 percent tariff on goods imported from China. The former Republican president has also said the U.S. should retaliate against any nation that tariffs American goods—even if those tariffs are 100 or 200 percent.
Several nations with strong diplomatic and economic ties to the United States still maintain high tariffs on American goods, especially automobiles. Both Germany and Japan have been able to tariff American car makers for almost 80 years because of the post-World War II Marshall Plan. Trump, however, proposes that this arrangement should change with either the countries dropping their high tariffs or the U.S. enacting their own on German and Japanese cars.
Today, tariffs only account for about two percent of federal revenue, while income taxes comprise about 94 percent of the government’s cash flow. While a ramp-up in tariff use could significantly change this dynamic, cuts to federal spending would still likely be needed. Currently, U.S. imports total approximately $3 trillion annually, while income and payroll taxes bring in $4.2 trillion.
Lastly, Democrats and some anti-Trump Republicans have tried to brand tariffs as inflationary. However, these attacks are highly misleading and, in some instances, outright falsehoods. Tariffs are, in simple terms, a form of consumption tax. Like most taxes, consumption taxes are deflationary in their economic effect. Properly understood inflation is either caused by increased demand driven by an expanding money supply or by the constriction of the supply of goods through policy or other means.
Tariffs neither increase the monetary supply nor prevent consumers from accessing goods; they are merely taxes importers pay on foreign goods. The most famous tariff legislation in U.S. history, the Smoot-Hawley Act, had a deflationary impact on the economy, not an inflationary one.
Read more at: TheNationalPulse.com
Tagged Under:
big government, Bubble, cancel Democrats, current events, Donald Trump, economic riot, elections, federal income tax, finance, Inflation, money supply, pensions, politics, progress, risk, tariffs, Taxes, Vote Republican, White House, Xpost
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 PENSIONS.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. Pensions.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Pensions.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.